Âmbito

A GOT – REVISTA DE GEOGRAFIA E ORDENAMENTO DO TERRITÓRIO foi criada em 2011 pelo Centro de Estudos de Geografia e Ordenamento do Território, que agrupa investigadores em Geografia e Ordenamento do Território associados à docência e/ou investigação realizadas nas Universidades do Porto e Coimbra e ainda outros investigadores, mesmo que não vinculados a estas universidades

A revista tem por objetivos:

1.1 - Divulgar a investigação científica;

1.2 - Promover o debate científico;

1.3 - Favorecer a ligação entre a investigação fundamental e o planeamento e gestão do território.

 

________________

A GOT tem por objetivo central a divulgação de trabalhos científicos nos domínios da Geografia e do Ordenamento do Território, particularmente os que se relacionem com os interesses das linhas que estruturam a investigação do CEGOT:

1. Natureza e dinâmicas ambientais;
2. Cidades - competitividade e bem-estar;
3. Paisagens culturais, turismo e desenvolvimento.

 

 

Políticas de Secção

Ficha Técnica

Submissões Abertas

Indexado

Revisto pelos Pares

Editorial

Submissões Abertas

Indexado

Revisto pelos Pares

Artigos

Submissões Abertas

Indexado

Revisto pelos Pares

PLURIS2021 - N.º Especial

Submissões Abertas

Indexado

Revisto pelos Pares

Ahead of print

Submissões Abertas

Indexado

Revisto pelos Pares

4º ENCONTRO INTERNACIONAL DO CEGOT

Submissões Abertas

Indexado

Revisto pelos Pares

Call CEGOT

Submissões Abertas

Indexado

Revisto pelos Pares

Publicados na Digithéke

Submissões Abertas

Indexado

Revisto pelos Pares

Processo de Revisão por Pares

De forma a garantir a qualidade científica dos artigos publicados, assim como garantir a imparcialidade da revisão e aceitação de  artigos para publicação, a GOT, possui um sistema de revisão cega por pares.

Uma descrição mais pormenorizada pode ser encontrada no ponto III do documento com instruções para autores.

_____________

A revista também adotou uma política de combate ao plágio.

Antes da revisão todos os textos são vistos pela equipa editorial para confirmar que se tratam de textos originais e autênticos. Se o plágio é detetado o artigo é imediatamente rejeitado e a situação reportada.

Política de Acesso Livre

Esta revista oferece acesso livre imediato ao seu conteúdo, seguindo o princípio de que disponibilizar gratuitamente o conhecimento científico ao público proporciona maior democratização mundial do conhecimento.

Arquivamento

Esta revista utiliza o sistema LOCKSS para criar um sistema de arquivo distribuído entre as bibliotecas participantes e permite às mesmas criar arquivos permanentes da revista para a preservação e restauração. Saiba mais...

Publication ethics and publication malpractice statement

GOT’s ethic statements are based on the Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

 

Publication decisions

The editor of GOT is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor makes his decision considering the forms and comments submitted by the reviewers (two for article) on the blind peer-review process.

Fair play

An editor should make his decisions considering the intellectual content of manuscripts without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

Authors should ensure that submitted work is original and has not been published elsewhere in any language, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Applicable copyright laws and conventions should be followed. Copyright material (e.g. tables, figures or extensive quotations) should be reproduced only with appropriate permission and acknowledgement.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

 

 

APCs (taxa de processamento de artigo) e taxa de submissão

GOT - Revista de Geografia e Ordenamento do Território não cobra aos autores qualquer tipo de taxa de submissão ou publicação.